Mosque’s lesson in dealing with ASIO BY: JOHN FERGUSON From: The Australian February 02, 2012 12:00AM

The article above beggar belief and underlines the following:

One we know through psychological research – the type of foundation text (method and content) sets up the cognitive behavior which kills and subjugates Other (particularly women).

We know through societal research serious societal schism does not require the ‘violent’ culture to be 50% plus 1 of the population.

We know that not every one from a ‘violent’ culture turns up in a suicide belt or joins the SS – everyone of these cultures determines itself in the main to be moderate.

We know with relative certainty a secular and religious text with exactly the same construct of Other will given the same societal context act for or against Other in relatively the same way. i.e. Would we have the head of our security service saying the following.

“ASIO is not against Nazi; it is against terrorism.” David Irvine, Director General of Security, January 2012

It is so obviously completely insane that we accept in our midst an Islamic Religious textual construct of Other which is exactly the same as a Nazi Secular textual construct with exactly the same results of Terror against Other which is proven each day yet we allow it to continue.

Cognitive dissonance is a discomfort caused by holding conflicting cognitions (e.g.,ideas, beliefs, values, emotional reactions) simultaneously. In a state of dissonance, people may feel surprise, dread, guilt, anger, or embarrassment.[1] The theory of cognitive dissonance in social psychology proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by altering existing cognitions or adding new ones to create consistency.[1] The diagram to the right shows a new cognition being integrated into a person’s belief system to resolve such a conflict.

Cognitive dissonance theory warns that people have a bias to seek consonance among their cognitions. This bias gives the theory its predictive power, shedding light on otherwise puzzling irrational and even destructive behavior.

Physiological basis of dissonance:
Musical styles are similar to languages, in that certain physical, physiological, and neurological facts create bounds that greatly affect the development of all languages. Nevertheless, different cultures and traditions have incorporated the possibilities and limitations created by these physical and neurological facts into vastly different, living systems of human language. Neither the importance of the underlying facts nor the importance of the culture in assigning a particular meaning to the underlying facts should be understated.

The Physiological reaction to two notes played simultaneously but with slightly different frequencies produce a beating “wah-wah-wah” sound that is very audible:

European reaction, musical dissonance or objectionable (“out of tune”) and go to great lengths to eliminate it.

Indonesian reaction musical consonance or attractive (“in of tune”) and go to equally great lengths to create it.

The degree ‘Freedom of Religion’ and/or multiculturalism will succeed is solely dependent on the capacity of a culture as a whole to be able to eliminate bias against Other, fellow humans schema (and in Western Democracies this is inclusive of women’s place in society as being equal not different).

A culture is derived from foundation text which informs not only the resultant cognitive behaviour but the method utilised to form the new citizen’s cognitive behaviour which in turn informs the cognitive behaviour itself.

There are two clear impediments to eliminating bias:

The first is the relative propensity of a culture to determine their schema to be certainly right. That is the degree to which the seeking of consonance among their cognitions as a culture accepts external cultures cognitions as their own. This is totally dependent on the degree to which a cultures foundation text values Other.

The second is the natural and destructive tendency, as underlined by differing cultural physiological reaction to perceived dissonance – is to seek consonance among their own cognitions. i.e.to go to great lengths to eliminate dissonance of Others schema (schemata) by developing and justifing cognitive behavoir which counters and even seeks to eliminate Others schema which is creating . Cognitive dissonance. Ie challenge to belief existence of God cannot be questioned and adherents as well as their elders and supposed transcribers of Gods word cannot be parodied without the imposition of ‘grievous harm’.

The trouble is the pathological altruism arises because the acceptance of cultural relativism enables ‘permanent terror’ within Society. ‘Permanent terror’ is the current price Australians and the rest of the world are paying for the notion of ‘Freedom of Religion’ and Multiculturalism. ‘Permanent Terror’ let alone the other negative Societal outcomes prove both to be a failure – unless there are enforced shared base ethics i.e. the foundation text is changed (method and content).

Despite the warning the theory of Cognitive dissonance starkly provides it is ignored under the false assumption in resolving the cognitive dissonance the resultant motivational drive to reduce dissonance by altering existing cognitions or adding new ones to create consistency is based on the acceptance of Other pre-existing schemas in the same Societal space.
Please reflect for all our sake:

“Decision theorists and cognitive scientists have recorded instances where individuals refuse to change their mental models even in the face of irrefutable evidence, because of the institutional support their unsatisfactory mental models get from peers and society at large.”

David Irvine, Director General of Security, if you do not know with relative certainty this a war against Islamic Foundation Text Australia is stuffed.

This Mosque and the entities supporting it must be closed down – now. You really want to make it easy for them. Keeping them in sight has to be balanced against the enabling of infrastructure, resources and recognition they receive by being seen as acceptable in civilized society whilst promoting and enabling its destruction.

BROWN SHIRTS & BLACK SKIRTS – IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?

Religious Trauma Syndrome: An Overview of Dr. Marlene Winell’s Article in the British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapies December 3, 2011 By Mriana

The Simple Answer to Ending the Terror – Plato Knew it years Ago Why have we not Understood?

Corruption never ceases to amaze me, even when all this money is being funneled into some black market pockets.

Might as well legalize the drugs and get it over and done with.

i don’t think seeing teens smoke ice ein a car while you have an all ages event is really in the upper stratosphere of community engagement.

I have been going to this festival for 10 years and 92% of goers are taking some kind of drug. If you aren’t into them then politely decline (which I’m sure you have no problem doing).

Unfortunately there wouldn’t be much of Rainbow in terms of fun & excitement if you took all the drugs away, which has LSD as a highly popular drug of choice. It’s a high yield, cheap, undetectable substance. If you like your booze then stick to it exclusively.

Btw I hope you enjoyed Rainbow this year. It was one on the best organised, well produced and run events in its history.

Cheers!

Taikonaut

This, like all other festivals, is a haven for dealers…

Accidents and overdoses are just waiting to happen with the lack of education available at the site.